Scientific References

  • Consensus Statements and Recommended Clinical Procedures Regarding Contemporary Surgical and Radiographic Techniques in Implant Dentistry. Bornstein MM, Al Nawas B, Kuchler U, Tahmaseb A. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Aug 15. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2013.g1
  • Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding computer-assisted implant dentistry. Hämmerle CH1, Stone P, Jung RE, Kapos T, Brodala N. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24 Suppl:126-31.
  • Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. Jung RE, Schneider D, Ganeles J, Wismeijer D, Zwahlen M, Hämmerle CH, Tahmaseb A. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24 Suppl:92-109.
  • Clinical advantages of computer-guided implant placement: a systematic review. Hultin M, Svensson KG, Trulsson M. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:124-35
  • Computer-aided manufacturing technologies for guided implant placement. Neugebauer J, Stachulla G, Ritter L, Dreiseidler T, Mischkowski RA, Keeve E, Zöller JE. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2010 Jan;7(1):113-29. doi: 10.1586/erd.09.61. Review.
  • Glossary of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. Laney WR, ed in chief. Chicago, IL: Quintessence Publishing Co, Ltd; 2007. (in 2013 Assessing Image-Guided Implant Surgery in Today’s Clinical Practice)
  • Flapless surgery and its effect on dental implant outcomes. Brodala N. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24(suppl):118-125. (in 2013 Assessing Image-Guided Implant Surgery in Today’s Clinical Practice)
  • Accuracy of implantation using the RoboDent navigation system: a prospective, multicentric, clinical observation. Doctoral Thesis of Juliane Ernst, Department of Medicine – Charité – University Medicine Berlin, June 2008
  • Somogyi-Ganss E, Holmes HI, Jokstad A. Accuracy of a novel prototype dynamic computer-assisted surgery system. Clin. Oral Impl. 2014 May 19. doi: 10.1111/clr.12414
  • Norkin FJ, Ganeles J, Zfaz S, Modares A. Assessing image-guided implant surgery in today’s clinical practice. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2013 Nov-Dec;34(10):747-50; quiz 751
  • Wittwer G, Adeyemo WL, Schicho K, Birkfellner W, Enislidis G. Prospective randomized clinical comparison of 2 implant navi­gation systems. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants 2007;22:785-790.
  • Luebbers HT, Messmer P, Obwegeser JA, et al. Comparison of differ­ent registration methods for surgical navigation in cranio-maxillo­facial surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2008;36:109-116.
  • Jayaratne YS, Zwahlen RA, Lo J, Tam SC, Cheung LK. Computer-aided maxillofacial surgery: An update. Surg Innov 2010;17:217-225.
  • Bouchard C, Magill JC, Nikonovskiy V, et al. Osteomark: A surgical navigation system for oral and maxillofacial surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;41:265-270.
  • Strong EB, Rafii A, Holhweg-Majert B, Fuller SC, Metzger MC. Comparison of 3 optical navigation systems for computer-aided maxillofacial surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;134:1080-1084.
  • Casap N, Wexler A, Eliashar R. Computerized navigation for surgery of the lower jaw: Comparison of 2 navigation systems. J Oral Maxil­lofac Surg 2008;66:1467-1475.
  • Poeschl PW, Schmidt N, Guevara-Rojas G, et al. Comparison of cone-beam and conventional multislice computed tomography for image-guided dental implant planning. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:317-324.
  • Wittwer G, Adeyemo WL, Schicho K, Birkfellner W, Enislidis G. Prospective randomized clinical comparison of 2 dental implant navigation systems. J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:785-790.
  • Lueth TC, Wenger T, Rautenberg A, Deppe H. RoboDent and the change of needs in computer aided dental implantology during the past ten years. IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom 2011;1-4.
  • Casap N, Laviv A, Wexler A. Computerized navigation for immedi­ate loading of dental implants with a prefabricated metal frame: A feasibility study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69:512-519.
  • Scherer U, Stoetzer M, Ruecker M, Gellrich NC, von See C. Template-guided vs. non-guided drilling in site preparation of dental implants. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19:1339-1346.
  • Noharet R, Pettersson A, Bourgeois D. Accuracy of implant place­ment in the posterior maxilla as related to 2 types of surgical guides: A pilot study in the human cadaver. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:526-532.
  • Farley NE, Kennedy K, McGlumphy EA, Clelland NL. Split-mouth comparison of the accuracy of computer-generated and conven­tional surgical guides. Intl Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:563­572.
  • Beretta M, Poli PP, Maiorana C. Accuracy of computer-aided template-guided oral implant placement: A prospective clinical study. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2014;44:184-193.
  • Zhao XZ, Xu WH, Tang ZH, et al. Accuracy of computer-guided implant surgery by a CAD/CAM and laser scanning technique. Chin J Dent Res 2014;17:31-36.
  • Tahmaseb A, Wismeijer D, Coucke W, Derksen W. Computer tech­nology application in surgical implant dentistry: A systemic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29(suppl):s25-s42.
  • Jung RE, Schneider D, Ganeles J, et al. Computer technology ap­plications in surgical implant dentistry: A systemic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24(suppl):92-109.
  • Vercruyssen M, Cox C, Coucke W, et al. A randomized clinical trial comparing guided implant surgery (bone- or mucosa-supported) with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template. J Clin Periodontol 2014;41:717-723.
  • Lee JH, Park JM, Kim SM, et al. An assessment of template-guided implant surgery in terms of accuracy and related factors. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5:440-447.
  • Pettersson A, Kero T, Soderberg R, Nasstrom K. Accuracy of virtually planned and CAD/CAM-guided implant surgery on plastic models. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1472-1478.
  • Di Giacomo GA, da Silva JV, da Silva AM, et al. Accuracy and com­plications of computer-designed selective laser sintering surgical guides for flapless dental implant placement and immediate defini­tive prosthesis installation. J Periodontol 2012;83:410-419.
  • Ersoy AE, Turkyilmaz I, Ozan 0, McGlumphy EA. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides gener­ated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants. J Periodontol 2008;79:1339-1345.
  • Ozan 0, Turkyilmaz I, Ersoy AE, McGlumphy EA, Rosenstiel SF. Clini­cal accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:394-401.
  • Valente F, Schiroli G, Sbrenna A. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: A clinical and radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxil­lofac Implants 2009;24:234-242.
  • Van de Wiele G, Teughels W, Vercruyssen M, et al. The accuracy of guided surgery via mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical templates in the hands of surgeons with little experience. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:1489-1494.
  • Kim SG, Lee WJ, Lee SS, et al. An advanced navigational surgery system for dental implants completed in a single visit: An in vitro study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2015;43:117-125.
  • Hultin M, Svensson KG, Trulsson M. Clinical advantages of computer-guided implant placement: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23(suppi}:s124-s135.
  • Wittwer G, Adeyemo WL, Wagner A, Enislidis G. Computer-guided flapless placement and immediate loading of four conical screw-type implants in the edentulous mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:534-539.
  • Arora KS, Khan N, Abboud' H, et al. Learning curves for cardio­thoracic and vascular surgical procedures-A systematic review. Postg rad Med 2015;127:202-214.
  • Koch AD, Ekkelenkamp VE, Haringsma J, et al. Simulated colonos­copy training leads to improved performance during patient-based assessment. Gastrointest Endosc 2015;81:630-636.